Troubled times for TMC
N Sathiya Moorthy in Madras
Last week, Justice S S Subramani of the Madras high court ordered
notice on a petition filed by Janata Party president Dr Subramanian
Swamy. The recipients of the notice will include Tamil Maanila
Congress supremo G K Moopanar and the Tamil Nadu
government.
The case involves the Moopanar family's Sri Venkatachalapathy Annadanam Trust.
Dr Swamy's case is that he was barred from
staging a demonstration at the trust office at Thanjavur, by the
state police, to highlight its 'anti-dalit bias'. The court, however, dismissed Dr Swamy's petition seeking to restrain the police from banning his proposed
procession.
''Moopanar is anti-dalit, as the trust deed, drafted in the forties,
will show,'' Dr Swamy had told the press in late
July and early August. He had threatened to stage a procession
of dalits to the trust office, if the TMC supremo did not amend
the trust deed to extend the benefits to dalits as well, before
August 15. The procession plan, the police ban and the court case
all flow from there.
The 'trust case' may have a long way to go, but coming as it does
in the wake of the legal tangle in the Rajya Sabha membership
row involving Moopanar and two party colleagues, the TMC
leadership appears to be sailing from one legal controversy to another.
Only a week earlier, the Delhi high court, over-ruling the orders
of a lower court, served notice to another TMC leader,
Union Finance Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram, in the Fairgrowth
share case, again at Dr Swamy's instance.
The case against Chidambaram involved his buying a promoter's
quota of shares in the controversial Fairgrowth group six years ago. Fairgrowth,
which featured prominently in the securities scam, has since gone under.
Dr Swamy alleges that Chidambaram sold these
shares at a substantial profit, violating the norms governing
such transfers, and also the wealth tax law.
Chidamabaram resigned as commerce minister from the Narasimha
Rao ministry in July 1992 following the
Fairgrowth controversy. Says Dr Swamy: ''Quitting the ministerial
post for a while, only to come back at the top some time later,
does not absolve him of the legal entanglements. As a lawyer, Chidamabaram should know better.''
A greater embarrassment for the
TMC leadership may be in store when the
Supreme Court hears the Central Bureau of Investigation plea in the the Indian Bank case. Here again, Dr Swamy is the protagonist, alleging that
many TMC leaders benefited from the generosity of M Gopalakrishnan, then
Indian Bank chairman and managing director, who is now facing criminal
charges.
There is also the question of successive
extensions granted to Gopalakrishnan, allegedly at a senior TMC leader's behest. Though media reports have mentioned the Committee of Secretaries, headed
by then cabinet secretary Zafar Saifullah, in this regard, legal responsibility may not stop there once the case opens.
As if all these were not enough, the TMC leadership may be called
upon to look the other way -- if not to defend its ally, the DMK --
when the Jain Commission interim report is tabled in Parliament.
According to media reports, Justice M C Jain -- who is investigating the
Rajiv Gandhi assassination conspiracy -- has
extensively referred to the DMK's role in the LTTE expanding its
operations in Tamil Nadu.
Dr Swamy, who has moved swiftly
against TMC leaders in the courts, has his own
share of embarrassment. He had moved similarly against then chief minister Jayalalitha, his then bete noire and now ally,
in a series of court cases. Of them, the Tansi land deal case
is still pending before the Supreme Court, and the Jayalalitha disqualification
case is before the Election Commission.
Included in the list is also the Chandralekha acid-attack case
targetted at the former IAS officer who is now state president of Dr Swamy's
Janata party. The CBI investigation report, sought by Chandralekha,
is yet to be presented before the Supreme Court.
Dr Swamy claims he "will pursue all the cases
against Jayalalitha to their logical conclusion despite
our political alliance. Even the Chandralekha case we are ready to pursue
once the apex court fixes a date." Chandralekha has hinted at Jayalalitha's hand
in the attack.
EARLIER REPORTS:
Delhi HC directs inclusion of Chidambaram's name in plea
Moopanar resigns from Rajya Sabha
Jain Commission report may upset UF applecart
|