rediff.com
rediff.com
News
      HOME |NEWS | INTERVIEW
June 19, 2001

NEWSLINKS
US EDITION
COLUMNISTS
DIARY
SPECIALS
INTERVIEWS
CAPITAL BUZZ
REDIFF POLL
THE STATES
ELECTIONS
ARCHIVES
SEARCH REDIFF





 Search the Internet
         Tips

E-Mail this interview to a friend

Print this page
Recent Interviews
'The govt is intolerant
     to any criticism'
     - Yubaraj Ghimire
'Four men sat down
     for dinner and invited
     Musharraf''
     - K Natwar Singh
'Musharraf's perfor-
     mance is one of missed
     opportunities'
     - Benazir Bhutto
'The monarchy is
     passing through a crisis'
     - Prof S D Muni
'King Gyanendra is not
     anti-India'
     - Romesh Bhandari


The Rediff Interview/Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi

A cease-fire is usually applauded. But the Centre's move to extend the ceasefire with the National Socialist Council of Nagalim (Isak-Muivah) to the Naga-inhabited areas in other Northeastern states has met with stringent criticism, especially from Assam.

In an exclusive interview with Ramesh Menon in New Delhi, Tarun Gogoi, the chief minister of Assam, says the cease-fire holds out ominous portents. Excerpts:

You have been very upset with the Centre's move to extend the ceasefire with the NSCN.

We welcome the extension of the ceasefire as long as it is confined to Nagaland. But we are strongly opposed to the extension of the ceasefire in Assam.

Why?

You see, there is no reason to extend it. Unless there is a motive, why should it be extended to other Northeastern states? Obviously the Naga insurgents have got their eyes on a lot of other areas other than Nagaland. They basically want to link all these areas into making what they call a Greater Nagaland.

You have said that Assam will never agree to the concept of a Greater Nagaland.

We just cannot concede any land from Assam to carve out another state. If we do it, the Kukis will be up in arms for a Greater Manipur, the Khasis will be up in arms for a Greater Meghalaya. There will be no end to it. The Nagas are not the only tribe who live in Assam.

'The home secretary in Delhi sent a fax to my chief secretary about the extension. That is how I came to know. This is no way to handle something as sensitive as this.'
The demand for a Greater Nagaland has been there for so many years. We need to look at their motives. For so many years, we have had border disputes with Nagaland. I remember, even in 1971, there were clashes. It is still going on. We cannot sacrifice the territorial integrity of Assam.

What will happen with the extension now?

As it is there are numerous terrorist camps in Assam and other Northeastern states. The ULFA has already established links with numerous insurgent groups that include the NSCN. Obviously, this is dangerous. There will be an increase in militant activities. We are opposing the ceasefire only to ensure that the militant activity does not escalate.

You seemed quite upset after the declaration of the cease-fire.

We were not even consulted. How can the central government do this? We could easily have been taken into confidence. These are sensitive issues.

How did you come to know of the cease-fire?

The home secretary in New Delhi sent a fax to my chief secretary about the extension. That is how I came to know. This is no way to handle something as sensitive as this. Manipur is burning with militant activity at the moment.

What are the feelings in other states about this?

The governor of Manipur also spoke to Home Minister L K Advani and said the same things I am saying. He conveyed the resentment of the people of Manipur.

I also spoke to Arunachal Chief Minister Mukut Mithi. He feels the same. He does not have a major problem of insurgency like me. He only has to worry about some minor activity in two districts. I have to worry about large-scale insurgency in Jorhat, North Cachar, Karbi Anglong, Golaghat and Sibsagar.

You just met the home minister. What did he say?

He just said that he would take care and I should not worry.

What did you say?

The Centre should have worked out a comprehensive peace package for all northeastern insurgent groups'
I said -- 'Please withdraw the ceasefire from my state.' And explained why it should be confined to Nagaland. I told him of the dangers involved. He said that the Centre will not concede to the insurgents and will not allow them to create trouble.

The home minister does not know the ground realities in Assam. It is not going to be easy.

What is the solution?

The solution is -- let not this peace process be confined to Nagaland. Yes, we want peace in Nagaland. But why not peace in the other states? What the Centre should have done is to work out a comprehensive peace package for all insurgent groups of the Northeast. This is our demand now.

What are you planning to do about the ULFA insurgency in Assam?

I have already made appeals to the ULFA saying we are interested in peace.

What we are planning is a long-term strategy and not one for one or two years. We have to concentrate on development activities. Many of our youngsters have strayed into the ULFA only because they have nothing to do, as they cannot find jobs. Unemployment is a serious issue in Assam. We cannot, therefore, wait for peace to return before we start on development-oriented and employment-generating activity.

Do you think the ousted AGP will let you contain the ULFA or win them over?

The ULFA was created by the AGP.

ALSO READ:
Advani denies move for Greater Nagaland
Bandh called in Assam against Naga ceasefire

Tell us what you think of this interview
HOME |NEWS | CRICKET | MONEY | SPORTS | MOVIES | CHAT | BROADBAND | TRAVEL
ASTROLOGY | NEWSLINKS | BOOK SHOP | MUSIC SHOP | GIFT SHOP | HOTEL BOOKINGS
AIR/RAIL | WEDDING | ROMANCE | WEATHER | WOMEN | E-CARDS | SEARCH
HOMEPAGES | FREE MESSENGER | FREE EMAIL | CONTESTS | FEEDBACK