HOME   
   NEWS   
   BUSINESS   
   CRICKET   
   SPORTS   
   MOVIES   
   NET GUIDE   
   SHOPPING   
   BLOGS  
   ASTROLOGY  
   MATCHMAKER  


Search:



The Web

Rediff








Business
Portfolio Tracker
Business News
Specials
Columns
Market Report
Mutual Funds
Interviews
Tutorials
Message Board
Stock Talk



Home > Business > Business Headline > Report

Cellular firms move court on telecom papers

BS Economy Bureau | April 22, 2003 13:42 IST

The cellular service operators have filed a caveat in the Supreme Court seeking to be party in the case against the department of telecommunications on the issue of disclosure of documents relating to limited mobility. The case is likely to be taken up by the apex court on Tuesday.

The department had filed a petition in the Supreme Court on April 17 seeking a stay on the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal order to make public those documents that were written by the government and the telecom regulator while deciding to allow limited mobility services.

In its application, the department has sought protection of Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, saying that the documents are not relevant at present.

The department said the documents sought belonged to a class of unpublished records that should not be disclosed to secure proper functioning of public service.

It said a denial of privilege could have serious implications on the functioning of the government. The department has also sought exemption under Section 8(e) of the Freedom of Information Act, 2002.

The Act stipulates that documents like minutes or records of advice, opinions or recommendations made by an officer of public authority during a decision-making process is exempted from disclosure.

"As a matter of principle, the government is entitled to keep its files confidential from private litigating parties who have commercial interests. In this case, the government attempted to provide the maximum possible transparency by restricting its claims for privilege to only three documents," the affidavit said.

The department also said government decisions were taken keeping the security implications in mind. Moreover, opinions expressed by officials needed to be confidential, it said. "This would cause impediments in the fearless expression by government officers," it added.


Powered by



Article Tools

Email this Article

Printer-Friendly Format

Letter to the Editor



Related Stories


Govt to challenge TDSAT order

Ayodhya: SC refuses to stop digging



People Who Read This Also Read


Stapling fiat

Teaching kids the value of saving







HOME   
   NEWS   
   BUSINESS   
   CRICKET   
   SPORTS   
   MOVIES   
   NET GUIDE   
   SHOPPING   
   BLOGS  
   ASTROLOGY  
   MATCHMAKER  
© 2003 rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.