Rediff Logo
Line
Channels: Astrology | Broadband | Chat | Contests | E-cards | Movies | Romance | Money | Travel | Weather | Wedding | Women
Partner Channels: Auctions | Auto | Education | Jobs | TechJobs | Technology
Line
Home > Cricket > Newsletter Diary > The Newsletter
Feedback  
  sections

 -  News
 -  Betting Scandal
 -  Schedule
 -  Database
 -  Statistics
 -  Interview
 -  Conversations
 -  Columns
 -  Gallery
 -  Broadband
 -  Match Reports
 -  Archives

 Search Cricket
 

 
 Search the Internet
           Tips

E-Mail this report to a friend

Print this page

G'day, all...

Some reading matter for you today, but not from me.

Here is the text of a mail/reader column carried in The Daily News, of date. Judging by the contents, Steve Waugh in his latest book has taken off on Muthiah Muralitharan's action. Here goes, the full text, written by a George Mendis:

--------------------------------------------------------

Play it straight Mr. Steve Waugh Reference your remarks in the Book 'Never Satisfied' on Muralitharan

I am writing this personal, open letter to you in regard to the unfortunate statements alleged to be made in your book 'Never Satisfied' in respect of the legality of the bowling action of Muralitharan of Sri Lanka (Reference SL Island paper of 13.11.2000_. It appears on the surface that a second Darrel Hair strategy to create another situation in the cricket world is being created and also envisaging a gain in some amount of publicity for greater readership of the book is aimed at.

I wish to state that I know some amount on cricket as played by sportsmen, having been involved in the game at School, University and Club levels and is a cricket enthusiast and have seen the best of players inclusive of the great Bradman, the gentleman cricketer par excellence, at play in Sri Lanka, Australia and England. I rate Steve Waugh as one of the world's best batsmen currently - I say in batsmanship as a player.

My kind request is for you to withdraw the said remarks in your book as they are unfair, illegally worded by a great player cricketer like you - the questionable wording is 'not cricket' and is inconsistent with the cricketing regulations as accepted democratically and as a played by gentlemen/sportsmen in the International circles under the auspices of the International Cricket Council.

Instead of paying 100% reliance on an Umpire, with no test level playing experience or high level participation in playing cricket and being misled and only endorsing prejudicial remarks on a simple bowler recognised by the world's best Cricketers and Critics, other than by Mr. S. Waugh, I request for the sake of Legality/Justice/Fairplay and Sportsmanship to pay consideration to the very critical and exhaustive scientific examination made to the ICC panel that comprised highly qualified Internationally reputed gentlemen with vast experience.

Let me quote extracts of the report: "A scientific analysis of the Sri Lankan off-spinner's bowling style using the latest computer technology has ended one of the hottest debates in cricket by proving once and for all that his action is perfectly legal (LEGAL).... The results, which were presented to delegates at the World Congress of Science and Medicine in Cricket at Lilleshall in Shrophire and have also been passed on to the International Cricket Council are so conclusive that they should put an end to any doubts about the legality of his action."

Hence if you play ICC level cricket, remarks of the type made by you ('His action is blatantly illegal. That as far as I (Mr. S. Waugh) is concerned that if he breaks the world wicket-taking record, then the world record means nothing." are unfair, 'not cricket' and unsportsmanly; it shows us a certain amount of prejudice, animosity and jealousy. Probably Mr. Waugh could manage any bowler, but not the deceptive great spin of a simpleton from an outstation in a simple, small yet developing South Asian country.

Please play a straight bat, Mr. Steve Waugh. We will not be prejudiced or led mistakenly by anyone ignorant and unfair in word and hasty deed in cricket in-field and out and dare to stoop low to say that twin brothers are partners in the same boat on casual remarks heard, when a Waugh twin had committed a cricketing crime as grave as the Cronje affairs, although treated very lightly by the ACB authorities. As this was done by your twin partner/another teammate can I repeat your statement 'blatantly illegal. how ludicrous it is?' because when Cronje is severely punished and expelled from the cricket world and also some of the Pakistan and Indian senior players, the Waugh twin etc. is playing safe; I have no doubt on your honesty at play.

We have heard critical outspoken remarks on ICC level cricket by the best of experienced test class sportsmen, like Tony Greig, Ian Chappel etc. - straight and critical the remarks have been very fare, objective and impartial and by no means blatantly illegal or ludicrous.' in criticism.

We also remember how Tony Greig showed Muralitharan's arm action on the TV as clearly legal. Even the President of the Australian Cricket Society, a University level authority on Sports Law and Cricket, had made very objective remarks in the ACS Journal on Cricket standards in Sri Lanka. In the name of gentlemanly cricket in field and out. George Mendis

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Intriguing, yes?

I know that there are quite a few subscribers to this diary living in Australia -- can someone help, and find out what this is all about, and what Waugh actually said?

I'll stop with that for today -- as you will see when you visit our site, today's episode in the ongoing BCCI vs CBI investigation is a mammoth affair, and involves a lot of research. So, for now, adios...

Prem


Mail Cricket Editor